If he didn't kill the lobbyist and that definitely was NOT Gormogon then who the hell was in that closet jumping out with the knife at the end of Knight on the Grid?
It was the apprentice before Zack. The one that Zack said the Master then killed because "there can only ever be two."
Zack clearly admitted to killing the lobbyist before, and now he's back tracking? I would have done it if he asked me but I didn't actually do it? Come on guys, pick your fork in the road and then stick with it.
Yes! That's what I meant by cop-out!
::sigh:: What I wouldn't give for 5 minutes in the writer's room with those guys to discuss the concept of continuity...
What I wouldn't give for you to have 5 minutes in the writer's room with those guys to discuss the concept of continuity...
It was the apprentice before Zack. The one that Zack said the Master then killed because "there can only ever be two."
Didn't they already have him in custody by that point? And then he'd already killed himself? I thought that was the apprentice before Zack. That way how they tried to go with Zack killing the lobbyist in PitH.
What I wouldn't give for you to have 5 minutes in the writer's room with those guys to discuss the concept of continuity...
Didn't they already have him in custody by that point? And then he'd already killed himself? I thought that was the apprentice before Zack. That way how they tried to go with Zack killing the lobbyist in PitH.
I think that's what we thought before, and it was sloppy because we knew it wasn't Zack jumping out with the knife. But now, the guy who killed himself was the apprentice before the apprentice before Zack... or so we are led to believe! Clear as mud?! Yeah, me too!
I think we caring viewers are making three errors: 1. We are expecting a Fox show to be like real life and so, be a linear experience of the time space continuum. Hah!
2. We are trying to understand the workings of a criminally insane cannibal's mind. I don't know many of them.
3. We are too clever to be conned by sloppy writing. Actually, that's the writers' mistake for not knowing there are intelligent adults with memories and expectations of continuity in their audience, Why do we always get suckered?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 02:56 am (UTC)It was the apprentice before Zack. The one that Zack said the Master then killed because "there can only ever be two."
Zack clearly admitted to killing the lobbyist before, and now he's back tracking? I would have done it if he asked me but I didn't actually do it? Come on guys, pick your fork in the road and then stick with it.
Yes! That's what I meant by cop-out!
::sigh:: What I wouldn't give for 5 minutes in the writer's room with those guys to discuss the concept of continuity...
What I wouldn't give for you to have 5 minutes in the writer's room with those guys to discuss the concept of continuity...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 03:05 am (UTC)Didn't they already have him in custody by that point? And then he'd already killed himself? I thought that was the apprentice before Zack. That way how they tried to go with Zack killing the lobbyist in PitH.
What I wouldn't give for you to have 5 minutes in the writer's room with those guys to discuss the concept of continuity...
HA! Thanks! :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 03:13 am (UTC)I think that's what we thought before, and it was sloppy because we knew it wasn't Zack jumping out with the knife.
But now, the guy who killed himself was the apprentice before the apprentice before Zack... or so we are led to believe!
Clear as mud?! Yeah, me too!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 03:16 am (UTC)Nope! I'm freakin' lost...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:49 am (UTC)Please! That's another show (Lost) that drives me crazy.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 03:18 am (UTC)LMAO Yup, exactly that. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 11:24 pm (UTC)1. We are expecting a Fox show to be like real life and so, be a linear experience of the time space continuum. Hah!
2. We are trying to understand the workings of a criminally insane cannibal's mind. I don't know many of them.
3. We are too clever to be conned by sloppy writing. Actually, that's the writers' mistake for not knowing there are intelligent adults with memories and expectations of continuity in their audience, Why do we always get suckered?